Re: [PATCH] PCI: boot parameter to avoid expansion ROM memory allocation

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...>
Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@...>, <jbarnes@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-pci@...>
Date: Monday, May 12, 2008 - 6:30 pm

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 02:43:44PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
	<snip>

I could certainly do that but I had intended that the new
pcibios_fixup_device_resources function act as a container where
other kinds of fixups could be added later.  Do you (or others)
think the additional cycles consumed by this approach are an
issue here?

Thanks,
Gary

-- 
Gary Hade
System x Enablement
IBM Linux Technology Center
503-578-4503  IBM T/L: 775-4503
garyhade@us.ibm.com
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] PCI: boot parameter to avoid expansion ROM memor..., Gary Hade, (Mon May 12, 6:30 pm)
Re: [RFC] which drivers need to map ROM BARs?, Jesse Barnes, (Wed May 14, 12:58 pm)