Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sunday, May 11, 2008 - 6:01 am

* Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:


this needs to check for ret != 0 as well, otherwise we can be woken but 
a timeout can also trigger => we lose a wakeup. I.e. like the patch 
below. Hm?

	Ingo

----------------------------->
Subject: semaphore: fix #3
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Sun May 11 09:51:07 CEST 2008

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/semaphore.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/semaphore.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ linux/kernel/semaphore.c
@@ -194,6 +194,13 @@ struct semaphore_waiter {
 	struct task_struct *task;
 };
 
+static noinline void __sched __up(struct semaphore *sem)
+{
+	struct semaphore_waiter *waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list,
+						struct semaphore_waiter, list);
+	wake_up_process(waiter->task);
+}
+
 /*
  * Because this function is inlined, the 'state' parameter will be
  * constant, and thus optimised away by the compiler.  Likewise the
@@ -231,6 +238,10 @@ static inline int __sched __down_common(
 	}
 
 	list_del(&waiter.list);
+	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) &&
+					((sem->count > 1) || ret))
+		__up(sem);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -254,9 +265,10 @@ static noinline int __sched __down_timeo
 	return __down_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, jiffies);
 }
 
-static noinline void __sched __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	struct semaphore_waiter *waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list,
-						struct semaphore_waiter, list);
-	wake_up_process(waiter->task);
-}
+
+	/*
+	 * Rotate sleepers - to make sure all of them get woken in case
+	 * of parallel up()s:
+	 */
+	list_move_tail(&waiter->list, &sem->wait_list);
+
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Mon May 5, 10:48 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 4:18 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 6, 4:44 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 5:09 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 9:23 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 6, 9:36 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Alan Cox, (Tue May 6, 9:39 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 9:42 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, J. Bruce Fields, (Tue May 6, 9:44 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Alan Cox, (Tue May 6, 9:45 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 9:51 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 6, 10:21 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 10:31 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 6, 10:39 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 6, 10:42 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 6, 10:45 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 6, 10:49 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 6, 11:07 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 6, 1:28 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue May 6, 7:11 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue May 6, 8:41 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 6, 8:59 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue May 6, 9:46 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 6, 11:26 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 6, 11:28 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue May 6, 11:49 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed May 7, 12:05 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andi Kleen, (Wed May 7, 4:00 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 4:46 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andi Kleen, (Wed May 7, 5:21 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Alan Cox, (Wed May 7, 6:59 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Alan Cox, (Wed May 7, 7:35 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 7:36 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andi Kleen, (Wed May 7, 7:57 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 8:00 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 8:02 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 8:19 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Wed May 7, 8:31 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 9:20 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 9:22 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 9:35 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 9:38 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 9:55 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:05 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:08 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:14 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Wed May 7, 10:16 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:22 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:24 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:25 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:27 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:31 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:36 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:47 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:49 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:55 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 10:59 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 11:02 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 11:17 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 11:17 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 11:27 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 11:43 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 11:49 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 12:01 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 12:09 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 12:24 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 12:44 pm)
Oi. NFS people. Read this., Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 1:00 pm)
Re: Oi. NFS people. Read this., Trond Myklebust, (Wed May 7, 3:10 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed May 7, 7:44 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed May 7, 8:24 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 8:29 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 8:34 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed May 7, 9:08 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 9:17 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed May 7, 9:37 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 11:43 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Wed May 7, 11:48 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Thu May 8, 12:14 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Thu May 8, 12:39 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Thu May 8, 1:44 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Thu May 8, 2:21 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Thu May 8, 2:29 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Thu May 8, 2:30 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 8, 7:58 am)
[git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Thu May 8, 8:10 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 8, 8:33 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Thu May 8, 8:41 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 8, 12:42 pm)
Re: Oi. NFS people. Read this., J. Bruce Fields, (Thu May 8, 6:43 pm)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 4:03 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 4:11 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 4:14 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 4:48 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 5:50 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 5:52 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 6:01 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 6:02 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 6:06 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 6:26 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 6:45 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 6:54 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 7:00 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Sven Wegener, (Sun May 11, 7:10 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 7:18 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 7:22 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 7:32 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 7:42 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 7:46 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 7:48 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 8:19 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 8:29 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 11, 9:47 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 13, 7:11 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 13, 7:21 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 13, 7:42 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 13, 8:28 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 13, 10:13 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 13, 10:22 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 13, 2:05 pm)