On Fri, 2 May 2008 12:27:46 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:

quoted text
> +void hlist_check(struct hlist_node *n)
> +{
> +	if (unlikely(*n->pprev != n)) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "hlist corruption. *pprev should be
> %p, "
> +				"but was %p\n", n, *n->pprev);
> +		BUG();
> +	}
> +	if (unlikely(n->next != NULL && n->next->pprev != &n->next))
> {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "hlist corruption. n->next->pprev
> should be"
> +				"%p, but was %p\n", &n->next,
> n->next->pprev);
> +		BUG();
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(hlist_check);
> 


Hi,
I like the concept of the patch; however...
BUG() is a tad on the rude side... how about WARN_ON(1) ?
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/