Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008 - 4:59 pm

On Thu, 1 May 2008 16:24:47 -0700
Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:


Honestly, I nearly died when I built all those cross-compilers.  Sooooooo
many combinations of gcc/binutils/glibc refused to work for obscure
reasons.  Compilation on x86_64 just didn't work at all and I ended up
having to build everything on a slow i386 box, etc, etc.  The stream of
email to Dan got increasingly strident ;)

I think crosstool has become a lot better since then, judging from the ease
with which Jens was able to spin up the powerpc compiler, but the trauma
was a life-long thing.

Vegard has been making noises about (finally!) preparing and maintaining a
decent set of cross-compilers for us.  It would be a great service (begs).

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] /dev/mem gcc weak function workaround, Venki Pallipadi, (Tue Apr 29, 6:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH] /dev/mem gcc weak function workaround, David Miller, (Tue Apr 29, 9:28 pm)
RE: [PATCH] /dev/mem gcc weak function workaround, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Wed Apr 30, 5:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] /dev/mem gcc weak function workaround, Tom Rini, (Wed Apr 30, 1:15 pm)
huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 1, 2:56 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Andrew Morton, (Thu May 1, 3:20 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 1, 3:27 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Andrew Morton, (Thu May 1, 3:33 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Venki Pallipadi, (Thu May 1, 3:35 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Andrew Morton, (Thu May 1, 3:42 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Jakub Jelinek, (Thu May 1, 3:49 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, David Miller, (Thu May 1, 3:51 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Tom Rini, (Thu May 1, 4:21 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Tom Rini, (Thu May 1, 4:23 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Tom Rini, (Thu May 1, 4:24 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Venki Pallipadi, (Thu May 1, 4:30 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Andrew Morton, (Thu May 1, 4:59 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Justin Mattock, (Thu May 1, 5:21 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 1, 5:34 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Suresh Siddha, (Thu May 1, 5:39 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Vegard Nossum, (Fri May 2, 12:18 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Adrian Bunk, (Fri May 2, 1:10 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Andi Kleen, (Fri May 2, 2:09 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Theodore Tso, (Fri May 2, 6:43 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri May 2, 2:09 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri May 2, 2:11 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Adrian Bunk, (Fri May 2, 2:19 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, David Miller, (Fri May 2, 3:02 pm)
[2.6.26 patch] #error for gcc 4.1.{0,1}, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jun 26, 3:37 am)