Linus Torvalds wrote:Just to add some emphasis here - this is something that took me a long time to figure out, and since it is the pattern for dealing with the x86 trees and with the mm git tree and with linux-next, it would help if it were documented somewhere (not that I can imagine where). Once you know it, it becomes obvious, but try staring at a merge conflict for a while trying to figure out what to do, and it gets frustrating. I wonder if we can guess how many testers abandon the mm git tree or the linux-next tree because of this. It might be nice if git supported a command like git-remote-help or something that would fetch a predefined help file from a remote tree that describes the workflow for that tree. But at least with an extra reply to this mail, it might creep higher in the google search results when looking for merge conflicts with linux-next. -- Kevin Winchester --
| James Bottomley | [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
