Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext3: move headers out of include/linux

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@...>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-ext4@...>
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008 - 2:39 pm

On Thu, 1 May 2008, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

I'd suggest not sending out patches like this.

If the patch is largely a rename one, and sent out for review, just use 
"git diff -M -p --stat --summary", because it's going to be a *lot* more 
reviewable that way.

Yeah, it means that people need git to apply it, but by now we can 
probably take that for granted - and more importantly, even if they don't 
have git installed: when you send out of RFC, aren't you looking for 
commentary more than people to apply and test it?

And then the patch saying that it's a rename (with perhaps changes to the 
guard #ifdef thing) would be a lot more clear. Nobody is going to read a 
patch that is 2800 lines of mostly create/delete with presumably almost no 
actual changes?

		Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH, RFC] ext3: move headers out of include/linux, Theodore Ts'o, (Thu May 1, 10:40 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext3: move headers out of include/linux, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 1, 2:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext3: move headers out of include/linux, Christoph Hellwig, (Thu May 1, 11:30 am)