On Thu, 1 May 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:Just to throw out an example: - make a "Random pending patch of the day" google gadget. I know that's abit out there, and I'm not sure the google gadget thing is realistic, but I bet I'm not the only one who ends up using the google homepage all the time. A button that says "this patch looks ok", "this patch looks crap", or "I dunno, give me another one to look at" might be a fun game that would encourage people to look at a couple of patches a day. You get five thousand people doing that occasionally (not every day, but maybe when they are bored and look for something more rewarding than trying to find bad music videos on youtube), and maybe you'd actually get feedback on patches. Make it pick a random commit that is in linux-next but hasn't been merged into main -git yet. Crazy? Probably. But at least it fits my notion of "let's not just wish people did more patch commentary" thing. IOW, if people are really serious about coming up with ways to improve code quality, I really think it needs to be about _practical_ things that can fit in our flow or can be extensions to it, not just wishing for better quality. "If wishes were horses, beggars would ride" Linus --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg KH | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
