On Thu, 1 May 2008, Al Viro wrote:That's not what I meant, and I think you know it. Of course as many people as possible should look at other peoples patches and comment on them. But saying so won't _make_ it so. And it's also something that we have done since day #1 _anyway_, so anybody who thinks that it would improve code quality from where we already are, should explain how he thinks the increase would be caused, and how it would happen. So when we're looking at improvement suggestions, they should be real suggestions that have realistic goals, not just wishes. And they shouldn't be the things we *already* do, because then they wouldn't be improvements. In other words: do people have realistic ideas for how to make others spend _more_ time looking at patches? And not just _wishing_ people did that? Linus --
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Martin Michlmayr | Network slowdown due to CFS |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
