Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008 - 1:49 pm

> I Recently found a system with a 2.6.4 kernel, and when i upgraded to

Memory is not something that is difficult to track. Its likely one of two things:

a) Your card now has 3d support, hooray! and X is mapping more regions, which
isn't really additional RAM usage.

b) Linux is caching more things, hooray! I'm not saying that you are one of
those people who just looks at the free number and doesn't think any further,
but you might be.

or c, the kernel has another 250MB is kernel data structures, seems unlikely.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!, Russ Dill, (Thu May 1, 1:49 pm)
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!, Kasper Sandberg, (Thu May 1, 9:47 pm)
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!, Russ Dill, (Thu May 1, 10:54 pm)
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!, Lee Mathers (TCAFS), (Fri May 2, 1:34 pm)
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!, Andi Kleen, (Fri May 2, 2:21 pm)
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!, Kasper Sandberg, (Fri May 2, 5:34 pm)
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!, Kasper Sandberg, (Fri May 2, 3:01 am)