Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » May » 1

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] introduce simple_set_mnt_no_get() helper for NFS

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Matthew Wilcox
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] introduce simple_set_mnt_no_get() helper for NFS
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008 - 9:58 am

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:46:55PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:

would the vfs_* prefix make sense here?

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[RFC][PATCH 0/5] do remounts without consulting sb->s_file ..., Dave Hansen, (Tue Apr 29, 11:59 am)
[RFC][PATCH 1/5] r/o bind mounts: change spinlock to mutex, Dave Hansen, (Tue Apr 29, 11:59 am)
[RFC][PATCH 2/5] introduce simple_set_mnt_no_get() helper ..., Dave Hansen, (Tue Apr 29, 11:59 am)
[RFC][PATCH 3/5] reintroduce list of vfsmounts over superblock, Dave Hansen, (Tue Apr 29, 11:59 am)
[RFC][PATCH 4/5] must hold lock_super() to set initial mou ..., Dave Hansen, (Tue Apr 29, 11:59 am)
[RFC][PATCH 5/5] check mount writers at superblock remount, Dave Hansen, (Tue Apr 29, 11:59 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] introduce simple_set_mnt_no_get() hel ..., Trond Myklebust, (Tue Apr 29, 2:34 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] introduce simple_set_mnt_no_get() hel ..., Dave Hansen, (Tue Apr 29, 6:46 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] must hold lock_super() to set initial ..., Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Apr 30, 2:25 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] must hold lock_super() to set initial ..., Dave Hansen, (Thu May 1, 9:26 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] introduce simple_set_mnt_no_get() hel ..., Matthew Wilcox, (Thu May 1, 9:58 am)