<big_snip /> Hi folks, what do you think about Gentoo's "bug-wrangler" concept ? Maybe could do something similar: An Tester group (which eg. should be the entry point for newbies), is responsible for receiving bug reports from users (maybe even distro maintainers who're not directly involved in kernel dev.). They try to reproduce the bugs and find out as much as they can, then file a report to the actual kernel devs (just critical bugs are directly kicked to the devs with high priority). Maybe this group could also keep users informed about fixes and give some upgrade advise, etc. This way we can build an good technical support (independent from distributors ;-P), newbies can learn on the job and te load on kernel devs is reduced, so they can better concentrate on their core competences. What do you think about this ? cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
| James Bottomley | [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
