Re: [PATCH 1/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger list

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...>
Cc: <torvalds@...>, <akpm@...>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...>, <linux-embedded@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Tim Bird <tim.bird@...>
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008 - 6:05 am

On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 11:55 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:

The I²C list would be the best place to send such a patch. You could
also copy it to the linux-embedded list if it's likely to be of interest
to a reasonable proportion of "embedded" developers, but that wouldn't
be the primary route into Linus' tree for most things.

I can't really see any way to make that clear in the MAINTAINERS file
that wouldn't be clumsy and just as confusing -- I think it'll work out
just fine by itself. Do you have a concrete proposal?

-- 
dwmw2

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger list, David Woodhouse, (Wed Apr 30, 1:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger ..., Kristoffer Ericson, (Fri May 2, 7:58 am)
[PATCH 1/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger list, David Woodhouse, (Wed Apr 30, 1:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger ..., David Woodhouse, (Thu May 1, 6:05 am)