login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
May
»
1
Re: Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression: deadlock on coredump of big process)
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...>
To: Tony Battersby <tonyb@...>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>, Mika Penttil? <mika.penttila@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Subject:
Re: Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression: deadlock on coredump of big process)
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008 - 4:39 am
>This patch fixes the deadlock. Tested on 2.6.24.5. Thanks!
quoted text
> >Tested-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com> >
thank you for test. I'll post this again when I'm back. Regards, -Kame --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
2.6.24 regression: deadlock on coredump of big process
, Tony Battersby
, (Mon Apr 28, 11:11 am)
Re: 2.6.24 regression: deadlock on coredump of big process
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Mon Apr 28, 9:00 pm)
Re: 2.6.24 regression: deadlock on coredump of big process
, Tony Battersby
, (Tue Apr 29, 10:10 am)
[PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression: dea...
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Wed Apr 30, 12:25 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:...
, Mika Penttilä
, (Wed Apr 30, 1:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:...
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Wed Apr 30, 1:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:...
, Nick Piggin
, (Wed Apr 30, 1:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:...
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Wed Apr 30, 1:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:...
, Tony Battersby
, (Wed Apr 30, 9:57 am)
Re: Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regress...
,
, (Thu May 1, 4:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:...
, Nick Piggin
, (Wed Apr 30, 2:11 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:...
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Tue May 6, 10:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:...
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Tue May 6, 10:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:...
, Nick Piggin
, (Wed Apr 30, 1:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:...
, Nick Piggin
, (Wed Apr 30, 12:46 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Washington Odhiambo
Weird Problem with NAT - more details
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Andrew Morton
-mm merge plans for 2.6.23
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments
David Miller
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Denys Fedoryshchenko
thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
597 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
Syndicate