Re: Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression: deadlock on coredump of big process)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Tony Battersby <tonyb@...>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>, Mika Penttil? <mika.penttila@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008 - 4:39 am

>This patch fixes the deadlock.  Tested on 2.6.24.5.  Thanks!
thank you for test. I'll post this again when I'm back.

Regards,
-Kame
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.24 regression: deadlock on coredump of big process, Tony Battersby, (Mon Apr 28, 11:11 am)
Re: 2.6.24 regression: deadlock on coredump of big process, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Mon Apr 28, 9:00 pm)
Re: 2.6.24 regression: deadlock on coredump of big process, Tony Battersby, (Tue Apr 29, 10:10 am)
[PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression: dea..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Wed Apr 30, 12:25 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Wed Apr 30, 1:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Wed Apr 30, 1:35 am)
Re: Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regress..., , (Thu May 1, 4:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue May 6, 10:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue May 6, 10:27 pm)