Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Stas Sergeev
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008 - 12:08 am

Guys, there really needs to be a
few more replies to make a decision.

So far only Dmitry have clearly stated
his opinion regarding both patches.
And that opinion was: no need for the
new config option, just get the 2.6.25
patch reverted.
Dmitry, after reading the older Michael's
thread, would you perhaps reconsider?

Sam and Michael said that just revering
may not be a good idea, but have not
commented on the patch that adds a new
option under "if EMBEDDED".

That puts me in a position where both
patches are effectively blocked, and
in a mean time snd-pcsp remains broken.

Guys, please, give your ACK or NACK on
the two posted patches! :)
Namely:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/26/105
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/26/283
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Stas Sergeev, (Sat Apr 26, 8:16 am)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Dmitry Torokhov, (Sat Apr 26, 4:18 pm)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Stas Sergeev, (Sat Apr 26, 4:39 pm)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Dmitry Torokhov, (Sat Apr 26, 9:23 pm)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Stas Sergeev, (Mon Apr 28, 12:34 pm)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Dmitry Torokhov, (Mon Apr 28, 12:58 pm)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Sam Ravnborg, (Mon Apr 28, 1:12 pm)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Dmitry Torokhov, (Mon Apr 28, 1:19 pm)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Stas Sergeev, (Tue Apr 29, 12:56 pm)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Michael Opdenacker, (Wed Apr 30, 12:31 am)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Stas Sergeev, (Wed Apr 30, 4:23 am)
Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies, Stas Sergeev, (Thu May 1, 12:08 am)