login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
9
Re: mutex_unlock
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
To: Justin Mattock <justinmattock@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>
Subject:
Re: mutex_unlock
Date: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 - 4:40 pm
On Wednesday, 9 of April 2008, Justin Mattock wrote:
quoted text
> Hello with testing out git(very cool); my first test was with > 2.6.25-rc8-00194-g4cac04d ran vary smoothly; > then I decided to pull the latest git (2.6.25-rc8-00208-g7180c4c)and > see what I might find. > upon reboot the system starts up giving me this: > > Starting up > Decompressing Linux Done > Booting the kernel > __ <-------blinking > > I waited a few seconds or minutes but nothing; > after reading earlier posts about something with a mutex_unlock maybe > this was what I was experiencing. > when loading a live cd and recompiling the same kernel, I noticed > under kernel hacking; > > RT Mutex debugging > Built in scriptable tester for rt-mutexes > Spinlock and rw-lock debugging > Mutex debugging basic checks > Lock debugging detect incorrect freeing of live locks > Lock debugging prove locking correctness > lock usage statistics > Lock dependency engine debugging > spinlock debugging sleep-inside-spinlock checking > Locking API boot-time self-tests > > With not knowing what I was doing I chose yes to all of these options, > then reboot -f, > The system booted up properly, > > Is there a way where I can find out if this was what was going on? > could this be something different?
Hm, interesting. It looks like our locking debugging code may hide some issues ... Thanks, Rafael --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
mutex_unlock
, Justin Mattock
, (Wed Apr 9, 3:17 am)
Re: mutex_unlock
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Wed Apr 9, 4:40 pm)
Re: mutex_unlock
, Justin Mattock
, (Wed Apr 9, 5:40 pm)
Re: mutex_unlock
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 11, 5:07 am)
Re: mutex_unlock
, Justin Mattock
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:07 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Christoph Lameter
Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Linus Torvalds
Re: [Patch v2] Make PCI extended config space (MMCONFIG) a driver opt-in
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers
Bart Van Assche
Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Christoph Hellwig
Re: [PATCH 06/32] IGET: Mark iget() and read_inode() as being obsolete [try #2]
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 26/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 1 (socket set...
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
3 users
and
567 guests
online.
Online users
paipailee32s
zeekec
olivdecka
Syndicate