Re: [patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <zach.brown@...>, <jroberson@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 - 3:08 pm

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:


Missing information.

What are the consequences of this race, when it occurs?


Yes, it's safe from that perspective.

However with this patch applied, we will no longer run eventfd_signal() if
kiocbIsCancelled(iocb).  Convincing is needed, please?
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix, Davide Libenzi, (Wed Apr 9, 2:45 pm)
Re: [patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix, Oliver Pinter, (Sun Apr 13, 8:29 am)
Re: [patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix, Davide Libenzi, (Sun Apr 13, 6:57 pm)
Re: [patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix, Oliver Pinter, (Mon Apr 14, 1:56 pm)
Re: [patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix, Davide Libenzi, (Mon Apr 14, 2:02 pm)
Re: [patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix, Andrew Morton, (Wed Apr 9, 3:08 pm)
Re: [patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix, Davide Libenzi, (Wed Apr 9, 3:19 pm)
Re: [patch] eventfd/kaio integration fix, Jeff Roberson, (Wed Apr 9, 3:33 pm)