On 04/09, David Woodhouse wrote:
quoted text >
> One of the supposed advantages of TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK in the first
> place, iirc, was that it allowed us to return a result code other than
> -EINTR as _well_ as restoring the signal mask.
Agreed, good point. ERESTART_ is not that flexible.
Somehow I assumed we will never need something "special" here, this is
not very clever.
Thanks to all!
Oleg.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 2/4] set_restore_sigmask TIF_SIGPENDING , Oleg Nesterov , (Wed Apr 9, 9:22 am)