Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: <linux-next@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 - 12:55 pm

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
...

Would it be safe for me (and preferred by you) to merge sched/for-akpm
into ieee1394/for-next to resolve this conflict until next mainline merge?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- -=-- -=--=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Apr 9, 4:53 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stefan Richter, (Wed Apr 9, 12:55 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 2:52 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stephen Rothwell, (Thu Apr 10, 3:44 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 5:48 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stefan Richter, (Thu Apr 10, 3:02 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Apr 9, 8:45 pm)