login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [Bug #10326] inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <rjw@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <marcus@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 - 7:56 pm

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed,  9 Apr 2008 01:02:09 +0200 (CEST)


This is already fixed by:

commit 50fd4407b8bfbde7c1a0bfe4f24de7df37164342
Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu Mar 27 17:42:50 2008 -0700

    [NET]: Use local_irq_{save,restore}() in napi_complete().
    
    Based upon a lockdep report.
    
    Since ->poll() can be invoked from netpoll with interrupts
    disabled, we must not unconditionally enable interrupts
    in napi_complete().
    
    Instead we must use local_irq_{save,restore}().
    
    Noticed by Peter Zijlstra:
    
    <irqs disabled>
    
      netpoll_poll()
        poll_napi()
          spin_trylock(&napi->poll_lock)
          poll_one_napi()
            napi->poll() := sky2_poll()
              napi_complete()
                local_irq_disable()
                local_irq_enable() <--- *BUG*
    
      <irq>
        irq_exit()
          do_softirq()
            net_rx_action()
              spin_lock(&napi->poll_lock) <--- Deadlock!
    
    Because we still hold the lock....
    
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index a2f0032..fae6a7e 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -383,9 +383,11 @@ static inline void __napi_complete(struct napi_struct *n)
 
 static inline void napi_complete(struct napi_struct *n)
 {
-	local_irq_disable();
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
 	__napi_complete(n);
-	local_irq_enable();
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
 /**
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Bug #10326] inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Apr 8, 7:02 pm)
Re: [Bug #10326] inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action, David Miller, (Tue Apr 8, 7:56 pm)
Re: [Bug #10326] inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Apr 8, 8:00 pm)
speck-geostationary