On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:09:57 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

quoted text
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:35:44 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> 1. Add mm->owner change callbacks using cgroups
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> +config MM_OWNER
> >> +	bool "Enable ownership of mm structure"
> >> +	help
> >> +	  This option enables mm_struct's to have an owner. The advantage
> >> +	  of this approach is that it allows for several independent memory
> >> +	  based cgroup controllers to co-exist independently without too
> >> +	  much space overhead
> >> +
> >> +	  This feature adds fork/exit overhead. So enable this only if
> >> +	  you need resource controllers
> > 
> > Do we really want to offer this option to people?  It's rather a low-level
> > thing and it's likely to cause more confusion than it's worth.  Remember
> > that most kernels get to our users via kernel vendors - to what will they
> > be setting this config option?
> > 
> 
> I suspect that this kernel option will not be explicitly set it. This option
> will be selected by other config options (memory controller, swap namespace,
> revoke*)

I believe that the way to do this is to not give the option a `help'
section.  Tht makes it a Kconfig-internal-only thing.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/