Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christian Kujau <lists@...>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 9:26 pm

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Christian Kujau wrote:

Heh. We've always had some pending/unresolved issues, and I think that as 
out tracking gets better, there's likely to be more of them. A number of 
bug-reports are either hard to reproduce (often including from the 
reporter) or end up without updates etc.

So yes, I do end up releasing with pending issues, although I often try to 
get a gut feel for what kind of severity we're talking about and not 
release with *big* pending issues.

		Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 7, 8:59 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Jan Engelhardt, (Mon Apr 7, 11:03 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Christian Kujau, (Mon Apr 7, 7:46 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Apr 7, 9:26 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Christian Kujau, (Tue Apr 8, 4:54 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Alessandro Suardi, (Mon Apr 7, 7:44 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Apr 8, 5:50 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 7, 7:18 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 7, 5:34 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Pekka Enberg, (Mon Apr 7, 9:15 am)