Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 7:46 pm

On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

Q: Has a consensus been made already whether or not to release the next
    kernel version with still pending/unresolved regressions?

Christian.
-- 
BOFH excuse #300:

Digital Manipulator exceeding velocity parameters
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 7, 8:59 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Jan Engelhardt, (Mon Apr 7, 11:03 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Christian Kujau, (Mon Apr 7, 7:46 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Apr 7, 9:26 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Christian Kujau, (Tue Apr 8, 4:54 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Alessandro Suardi, (Mon Apr 7, 7:44 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Apr 8, 5:50 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 7, 7:18 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 7, 5:34 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Pekka Enberg, (Mon Apr 7, 9:15 am)