On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:24:11 +0400
Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote:

quoted text
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/common/sa1111.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
> index eb06d0b..282a4d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ __sa1111_probe(struct device *me, struct resource *mem, int irq)
>  	if (!sachip)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	sachip->clk = clk_get(me, "GPIO27_CLK");
> +	sachip->clk = clk_get(me, "3_6MHz_CLK");
>  	if (!sachip->clk) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(sachip->clk);
>  		goto err_free;

Again, there's just not enough information for us (well: me) to be able to
evaluate this patch.

For example, if the current name is "incorrect" then why shouldn't we fix
it in 2.6.25?  2.6.24?  etc.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/