Hi Linus,

Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text
> I suspect the right thing to do is not to mark them for "IO", but mark 
> them for "short-lived", and allow short-lived allocations that don't have 
> extended lifetimes to succeed even when a "real" allocation wouldn't.

Yeah, makes sense. We do have GFP_TEMPORARY so we could associate this 
new semantics with that. But the real problem here is how to do the 
"allocate harder" part which, btw, sounds very similar to what Peter's 
kmalloc reserve patches try to do...

		Pekka
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/