On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Hugh Dickins wrote:
quoted text
> On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
> > 
> > This was sort of accidentally fixed in scsi-misc by commit 
> > 
> > commit c5f73260b289cb974928eac05f2d84e58ddfc020
> > Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> > Date:   Thu Mar 13 11:16:33 2008 -0500
> > 
> >     [SCSI] consolidate command allocation in a single place
> 
> Thanks, yes, that looks a good substitute to me.
> 
> > Could you check that:
> > 
> > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git
> > 
> > and see if it alleviates the problem? ... if so, we can work out which
> > pieces to backport.
> 
> Precisely that patch seems appropriate to 2.6.25-rc8-git, so I'm now
> running the test with just that applied to 2.6.25-rc8 (plus cfq rcu
> fix).  Not quite what you asked, but...
> 
> Strictly speaking, it'd take a couple of days to be reasonably sure
> that the livelock is gone (it appeared to reproduce quicker once I
> moved to -rc8 plus cfq rcu fix; but I'm not entirely convinced that
> wasn't just coincidence).  But if nothing bad appears overnight,
> let's assume your patch is the one to push: I'll report tomorrow.

Right, as expected, that seems to run fine: I've seen no problem with
it in 17 hours - beyond, of course, all the page allocation failures
which will plague such tests until something else is changed.

Somewhat irrelevant since Linus put my patch into 2.6.25-rc8-git
(probably worth it for the various issues noted in the comment);
but reassuring for 2.6.26.

I'll stop that test now and put it to work on something else.

Hugh
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/