Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » April » 7

2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

Previous thread: [PATCH] IB/ehca: extend query_device() and query_port() to support all values for ibv_devinfo by Stefan Roscher on Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:57 am. (2 messages)

Next thread: [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default (v2) by Balbir Singh on Monday, April 7, 2008 - 9:02 am. (5 messages)
[view original message]
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:59 am

[This time it's without the accompanying reply messages, because there are

some MIME-related problems with them I have yet to fix and I didn't want to

defer sending the entire report because of them, given that we have some new

regressions caused by very recent commits.


First of all, commit 92c9d07507f0a90b64172bfede7e6fa845e8e66b, for which

there is a patch at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/6/113, refers to undefined

symbols.


Second, http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10410 is worrisome.  It

looks like we have not understood the issue well enough, after all.


Apart from this, there seems to be a resume regression related to graphics

that's been causing some headaches to us recently.  It's unrelated to the

recently reverted ACPI commit, but apparently is generic enough to affect

the users of both the ATI and Intel adapters, but only some of them.]


This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.24, for which there

are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them have been fixed already,

please let me know.


If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.24, please let me know

either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the

entries below are invalid.


Listed regressions statistics:


  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved

  ----------------------------------------

  2008-04-07      188       29          22

  2008-03-31      177       34          31

  2008-03-27      171       38          30

  2008-03-22      159       35          31

  2008-03-17      148       38          30

  2008-03-16      146       42          35

  2008-03-14      145       45          39

  2008-03-12      143       51          41

  2008-03-11      141       58          43

  2008-03-10      138       66          47

  2008-03-03      115       65          49

  2008-02-25       90       51          39

  2008-02-17       61       45          37


Unresolved regressions

----------------------


Bug-Entry	: [ message continues ]
" title="http://bugzilla.kernel.org/...
[ message continues ]
">http://bugzilla.kernel.org/...
[ message continues ]

[view original message]
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>
To: <andy@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 11:03 pm

From BZ:


	“It looks like 2.6.24 is good, I guess I'll start bisecting....”


there have been two bridge-related patches between v2.6.24-rc6..v2.6.24:


  2dc2f20... [NETFILTER]: bridge-netfilter: fix net_device refcnt leaks

  2948d2e... [NETFILTER]: bridge: fix double POST_ROUTING invocation


Maybe it helps to try 2dc.

Not anymore a 2.6.25-rc issue it seems?

--
[view original message]
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>
Cc: <andy@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 - 5:14 am

You seem to be confused by the fact that the submitter typoed

"2.6.24-rc6" instead of "2.6.25-rc6" in his bug report?


cu

Adrian


-- 


       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out

        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.

       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.

                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


--
[view original message]
From: Christian Kujau <lists@...>
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 7:46 pm

Q: Has a consensus been made already whether or not to release the next

    kernel version with still pending/unresolved regressions?


Christian.

--

BOFH excuse #300:


Digital Manipulator exceeding velocity parameters

--
[view original message]
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@...>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 9:26 pm

Heh. We've always had some pending/unresolved issues, and I think that as

out tracking gets better, there's likely to be more of them. A number of

bug-reports are either hard to reproduce (often including from the

reporter) or end up without updates etc.


So yes, I do end up releasing with pending issues, although I often try to

get a gut feel for what kind of severity we're talking about and not

release with *big* pending issues.


		Linus

--
[view original message]
From: Christian Kujau <lists@...>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 - 4:54 pm

OK, got it. Thanks for clarifying this.


Christian.

--

BOFH excuse #285:


Telecommunications is upgrading.

--
[view original message]
From: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@...>
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 7:44 pm

This one is very difficult to verify. It happened exactly once in

 now 20 days... I'll be away from the box until the weekend,

 when I'll compile whatever kernel-of-the-day with Ilpo's fix

 on top, if it isn't in mainline by then, and... well, keep the

 torrents alive with an eye on the kernel logs.


Not sure what's the best thing to do with such a hard to

 reproduce issue. Perhaps marking it fixed by Ilpo's patch,

 and if it pops up again file a new bug linking it to the entry

 in bugzilla ?


--alessandro


 "Hold back the years, hold back the hours

 I want to live to see the sun break through these days"


 (Patrick Wolf, 'This Weather')

--
[view original message]
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
To: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 - 5:50 pm

Well, I will close it as "unreproducible".  You can always reopen it if the

problem occurs again.


Thanks,

Rafael

--
[view original message]
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...>
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 7:11 pm

Marcelo fixed this a few days ago; I'll post my 2.6.25 queue soon.


Can you bcc subsystem maintainers with entries on this list?  Or perhaps

those that opt-in?


--

Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.


--
[view original message]
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 7:18 pm

In the future I will send an automatic reply message to the report for each

regression listed and the CCs will be added to these messages.  This is still

under development, though, so please be patient.


Thanks,

Rafael

--
[view original message]
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 5:24 pm

that's now reverted via 5b13d863573e746739ccfc24ac1a9473cfee8df1.


	Ingo

--
[view original message]
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 5:34 pm

Yes, Adrian has already closed it.


Thanks,

Rafael

--
[view original message]
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>, Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 9:15 am

Do a git bisect for this as the report isn't getting much attention?

--
Previous thread: [PATCH] IB/ehca: extend query_device() and query_port() to support all values for ibv_devinfo by Stefan Roscher on Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:57 am. (2 messages)

Next thread: [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default (v2) by Balbir Singh on Monday, April 7, 2008 - 9:02 am. (5 messages)