Re: scsi: fix sense_slab/bio swapping livelock

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.ziljstra@...>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, <mpm@...>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 6:17 am

Hi Boaz,

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:

Constructors, user-defined alignment, and tighter object packing.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:

To be honest, I really don't quite understand your use-case. But as
far as I can tell, it hasn't never been explicitly guaranteed and most
certainly has not been true since the merging of SLOB and more
recently SLUB.

                Pekka
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: scsi: fix sense_slab/bio swapping livelock, Boaz Harrosh, (Mon Apr 7, 6:07 am)
Re: scsi: fix sense_slab/bio swapping livelock, Pekka Enberg, (Mon Apr 7, 6:17 am)