* Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:

quoted text
> I still have some concerns with this cpus_scnprintf patch.
> 
> I've taken them up with Mike offline for initial consideration.
> 
> If others have questions, concerns or enthusiasms for this patch, Mike 
> and I would be interested.

i dont mind the old patch either (which did an ugly temporary 
allocation), if it keeps the ABI. I dont think it's a big deal, lets not 
allow it to become a roadblock, and the overall goal of all these 
patches [4096 CPU support in upstream Linux] is important and i'm 
enthusiastic about that ;-)

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/