On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
quoted text
>
> Bryan Wu wrote:
>
> > We found the latest kernel compile failed with Blackfin STAMP537
> > configuration on our daily build machine.
> > ---
> >  CC      drivers/net/smc91x.o
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_rcv':
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:513: warning: passing argument 1 of 'insw' makes
> > integer from pointer without a cast
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_hardware_send_pkt':
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:620: warning: passing argument 1 of 'outsw' makes
> > integer from pointer without a cast
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859:32: error: macro "SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR" requires
> > 2 arguments, but only 1 given
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_probe':
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: 'SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR' undeclared (first
> > use in this function)
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
> > reported only once
> > drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > make[2]: *** [drivers/net/smc91x.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
> > make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> > ---
> >
> > That is because my -mm tree fixing bug patch:
> >
> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9e6db60825...)
> > was merged into mainline before the smc91x API change patch in -mm:
> >
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-m...
> >
> > Did I miss something here? or this patch is on the way before 2.6.25
> > final release?
> >
>
>  It looks like I missed something...  I thought akpm was going to send the
> patch for -mm in?
>
>  If not, let's revert this one...
>

ok, no problem, it is ok for me.

Thanks
-Bryan
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/