Bryan Wu wrote:
quoted text
> We found the latest kernel compile failed with Blackfin STAMP537
> configuration on our daily build machine.
> ---
>   CC      drivers/net/smc91x.o
> drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_rcv':
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:513: warning: passing argument 1 of 'insw' makes
> integer from pointer without a cast
> drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_hardware_send_pkt':
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:620: warning: passing argument 1 of 'outsw' makes
> integer from pointer without a cast
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859:32: error: macro "SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR" requires
> 2 arguments, but only 1 given
> drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_probe':
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: 'SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR' undeclared (first
> use in this function)
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
> reported only once
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/smc91x.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> ---
> 
> That is because my -mm tree fixing bug patch:
> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9e6db60825...)
> was merged into mainline before the smc91x API change patch in -mm:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-m...
> 
> Did I miss something here? or this patch is on the way before 2.6.25
> final release?

It looks like I missed something...  I thought akpm was going to send 
the patch for -mm in?

If not, let's revert this one...

	Jeff




--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/