On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:37:40AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:First of all you try to get the tracking of all bugs into Bugzilla, and now you've sent a batch of emails where the answers will not get into Bugzilla automatically. As an example, for the bug we are talking about the main value of you asking me in Bugzilla was not that I confirmed it's still present, the main value was that this caused Mauro to make a fix. What would have happened if Toralf had answered in an email that the bug is still present? And especially for trickier stuff like suspend/resume problems it might also make sense to send the email to all people who might possibly be involved with the bug - even if this means putting all email addresses from 5 MAINTAINERS entries into one email. It takes a bit more time when writing the emails, but my experience was it's worth it. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed --
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Adrian Bunk | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Winkler, Tomas | RE: iwlwifi: fix build bug in "iwlwifi: fix LED stall" |
