On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:36:50 +0300 Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> wrote:This is a very interesting idea, I didn't know it would be possible. I think this also is a new project and I'd be happy to let someone else take it over. We could still use the log format and tools from mmiotrace, at least for starters. This puts mmiotrace in a new ligth: there's something better(?) coming in the future. But mmiotrace is here now, and I'd still like to see it in mainline. Within ftrace framework, mmiotrace will be very easy to use even for a Linux newbie. The KVM approach would be targeted to developers, as I suspect setting it up (even when everything has been merged into mainline) is more work than running mmiotrace. Ingo, what do you think? In my opinion let's make mmiotrace force the system down to UP via CPU hotplugging while MMIO tracing is active. This should guarantee reliable traces in the easiest way possible. The current workaround is not reliable on SMP. "Works enough" is what I'm thinking of. Thanks. -- Pekka Paalanen http://www.iki.fi/pq/ --
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| James Bottomley | Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
