login
Header Space

 
 

Re: module parameters versus kernel command line

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...>
Cc: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@...>, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Jon Masters <jonathan@...>
Date: Saturday, April 5, 2008 - 6:54 pm

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 08:29:00 +1000
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:


Or maybe not have the warning at all, after all, even if sillymodule.sillyarg=1
doesn't make sense when I booted, who's to say I can't download the source
to sillymodule, compile it, and modprobe it after boot time :-).
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
module parameters versus kernel command line, Tom Horsley, (Thu Apr 3, 9:00 am)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Apr 3, 11:39 am)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Tom Horsley, (Thu Apr 3, 12:04 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Chris Friesen, (Thu Apr 3, 12:31 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Apr 3, 12:14 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Rusty Russell, (Thu Apr 3, 7:09 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Marc Pignat, (Fri Apr 4, 7:45 am)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Rusty Russell, (Fri Apr 4, 6:29 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Tom Horsley, (Sat Apr 5, 6:54 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Rusty Russell, (Sat Apr 5, 11:08 pm)
speck-geostationary