Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...>
Cc: Pekka Paalanen <pq@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, Pavel Roskin <proski@...>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, <vegard.nossum@...>
Date: Saturday, April 5, 2008 - 3:40 am

On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> wrote:

For kmemcheck, I'd prefer the per-CPU page tables suggested by Ingo.
I'm having hard time understanding why that's a "ugly hack" compared
to using kvm for this...
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] mmiotrace full patch, preview 2, Pekka Paalanen, (Sun Mar 9, 10:40 am)
mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit, Pekka Paalanen, (Fri Mar 28, 4:25 pm)
Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit, Pekka Paalanen, (Sun Mar 30, 1:26 pm)
Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit, Pekka Paalanen, (Thu Apr 3, 5:07 pm)
Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit, Avi Kivity, (Sat Apr 5, 3:36 am)
Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit, Pekka Paalanen, (Sun Apr 6, 1:32 pm)
Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit, Pekka Enberg, (Sat Apr 5, 3:40 am)
Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit, Avi Kivity, (Sat Apr 5, 8:39 am)
Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit, Avi Kivity, (Sat Apr 5, 11:58 am)
Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Apr 3, 5:40 pm)
Re: mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit, Pekka Paalanen, (Fri Apr 4, 9:18 am)
Re: [RFC] mmiotrace full patch, preview 2, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Mar 27, 7:13 pm)
Re: [RFC] mmiotrace full patch, preview 2, Pekka Paalanen, (Fri Mar 28, 2:24 pm)
Re: [RFC] mmiotrace full patch, preview 2, Pekka Paalanen, (Sun Mar 9, 10:46 am)