Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Brownell
Date: Friday, April 4, 2008 - 4:58 pm

On Friday 04 April 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:

That's true ... although I can imagine using DMA to
avoid dcache trashing if its setup cost is low enough,
with either NAND or NOR chips.

Still:  in this context vmalloc() is wrong.

- Dave
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, Michael Trimarchi, (Fri Apr 4, 3:23 am)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 4, 12:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, Russell King - ARM Linux, (Fri Apr 4, 1:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, David Brownell, (Fri Apr 4, 4:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, Josh Boyer, (Fri Apr 4, 4:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, David Brownell, (Fri Apr 4, 4:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, Josh Boyer, (Fri Apr 4, 6:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, Kyungmin Park, (Fri Apr 4, 6:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 4, 6:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, David Brownell, (Fri Apr 4, 7:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, David Brownell, (Fri Apr 4, 7:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 4, 8:27 pm)