Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...>
Date: Friday, April 4, 2008 - 2:33 pm

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 14:13 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:


I think the use of unlikely here and in pr_debug is unnecessary.


Shouldn't this be a module_table?

I think that hashing may be an unnecessary optimization and
that there's no real need to use a limited FILE_TABLE_SIZE
at all.  I think the most likely use cases for this facility
has either one or two modules being debugged or all modules
or no modules.

cheers, Joe

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Jason Baron, (Tue Apr 1, 3:49 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Randy Dunlap, (Tue Apr 1, 5:47 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Joe Perches, (Tue Apr 1, 10:07 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Jason Baron, (Wed Apr 2, 2:21 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Joe Perches, (Wed Apr 2, 2:58 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Jason Baron, (Fri Apr 4, 2:13 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Joe Perches, (Fri Apr 4, 2:33 pm)