Re: module parameters versus kernel command line

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...>, Tom Horsley <tom.horsley@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, April 4, 2008 - 7:45 am

On Friday 04 April 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
...

Why don't do it in user space (let insmod/modprobe parse /proc/cmdline)?
1. Users won't be surprised after looking at the new man pages:)
2. it will work with older kernel

The warning problem is more complicated to fix.

Regards

Marc
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
module parameters versus kernel command line, Tom Horsley, (Thu Apr 3, 9:00 am)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Apr 3, 11:39 am)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Tom Horsley, (Thu Apr 3, 12:04 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Chris Friesen, (Thu Apr 3, 12:31 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Apr 3, 12:14 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Rusty Russell, (Thu Apr 3, 7:09 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Marc Pignat, (Fri Apr 4, 7:45 am)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Rusty Russell, (Fri Apr 4, 6:29 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Tom Horsley, (Sat Apr 5, 6:54 pm)
Re: module parameters versus kernel command line, Rusty Russell, (Sat Apr 5, 11:08 pm)