Re: [patch 0/15] LogFS take five

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <joern@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-mtd@...>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...>
Date: Friday, April 4, 2008 - 7:46 am

On Tue, Apr 01 2008, joern@logfs.org wrote:

So you mean for writes through the page cache, you are seeing pages
allocated with __GFP_FS set?


A good starting point would be doing a stack trace dump in logfs if you
see such back recursion into the fs. A quick guess would be a missing
setting of mapping gfp mask?

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/15] LogFS take five, , (Tue Apr 1, 2:13 pm)
Re: [patch 0/15] LogFS take five, Jens Axboe, (Fri Apr 4, 7:46 am)
Re: [patch 0/15] LogFS take five, Jörn, (Mon Apr 7, 4:22 am)
Re: [patch 0/15] LogFS take five, Jens Axboe, (Mon Apr 7, 4:28 am)
Re: [patch 0/15] LogFS take five, Jörn, (Mon Apr 7, 5:10 am)
Re: [patch 0/15] LogFS take five, Jens Axboe, (Mon Apr 7, 5:17 am)
Re: [patch 0/15] LogFS take five^Wsix, Jörn, (Thu Apr 3, 1:13 pm)