Re: [PATCH 1/10] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function calls

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <peterz@...>, <npiggin@...>, <linux-arch@...>, <mingo@...>, <paulmck@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 6:56 pm

Jens Axboe wrote:

I wonder if it isn't finally time to drop this parameter?  Now that 
there aren't a zillion arch implementations of this to fix, we only need 
to fix a dozen or so callers.


Mention preemption needs to be disabled?  Or allow preemption and take 
appropriate precautions internally?  It's not obvious to me that all the 
callers are calling with preemption disabled.

WARN_ON(preemptible())?
preempt_disable()?

    J
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/10] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function c..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Apr 30, 6:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/10] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function c..., Paul E. McKenney, (Wed Apr 30, 10:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/10] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI fun..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Apr 30, 5:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/10] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI fun..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 29, 4:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/10] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI fun..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Apr 30, 10:51 am)