From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:03:43 -0700

quoted text
> drivers/net/8390.c:37:2: warning: returning void-valued expression
> drivers/net/bnx2.c:1635:3: warning: returning void-valued expression
> drivers/net/xen-netfront.c:1806:2: warning: returning void-valued expression
> net/ipv4/tcp_hybla.c:105:3: warning: returning void-valued expression
> net/ipv4/tcp_vegas.c:171:3: warning: returning void-valued expression
> net/ipv4/tcp_veno.c:123:3: warning: returning void-valued expression
> net/sysctl_net.c:85:2: warning: returning void-valued expression
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>

I wish this weren't marked with a warning, what spits this out,
sparse?

I know the kernel is written in C and not C++, but even Stroustrup
mentions this case explicitly in his book:

	 A void function cannot return a value.  However, a call of a
	 void function doesn't yield a value, so a void function can
	 use a call of a void function as the expression in a return
	 statement.

And I see no reason why there's anything wrong with this construct.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/