login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
30
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Alexey Dobriyan
Subject:
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 3:12 pm
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:06:05AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Apr 29 2008, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:55:09PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 02:04:13PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 28 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:55:53 +0400 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This happened while ~90 cross-compile jobs were running in parallel on > > > > > > ext2/noatime partition (slowly -- much debugging was on) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > general protection fault: 0000 [1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC > > > > > > CPU 0 > > > > > > Modules linked in: ext2 nf_conntrack_irc ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables usblp uhci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore sr_mod cdrom > > > > > > Pid: 16483, comm: as Not tainted 2.6.25-c3bf9bc243092c53946fd6d8ebd6dc2f4e572d48 #1 > > > > > > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80307525>] [<ffffffff80307525>] call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50 > > > > > > RSP: 0018:ffff810170811e58 EFLAGS: 00010202 > > > > > > RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff81010ff92000 > > > > > > RBP: ffff810170811e78 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8100010069d8 R12: ffff810138ada300 > > > > > > R13: ffffffff803075b0 R14: ffff81017fcd2000 R15: ffff81010ff92168 > > > > > > FS: 00002ac3462426f0(0000) GS:ffffffff805d0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > > > > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > > > > > > CR2: 00002ab602550000 CR3: 000000013609d000 CR4: 0000000000000660 > > > > > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > > > > > Process as (pid: 16483, threadinfo ffff810170810000, task ffff81010ff92000) > > > > > > Stack: ffff810170811e88 ffff810138ada300 0000000000000010 ffff81010ff92100 > > > > > > ffff810170811e88 ffffffff80307580 ffff810170811ea8 ffffffff80302a55 > > > > > > ffff81010ff92100 ffff810138ada300 ffff810170811ec8 ffffffff80302b1f > > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > > [<ffffffff80307580>] cfq_free_io_context+0x10/0x20 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80302a55>] put_io_context+0x85/0x90 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80302b1f>] exit_io_context+0x8f/0xb0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80235d19>] do_exit+0x549/0x780 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80235f8e>] do_group_exit+0x3e/0xb0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80236012>] sys_exit_group+0x12/0x20 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8020b6db>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Code: 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 55 49 89 f5 41 54 49 89 fc 53 48 83 ec 08 e8 18 e1 f5 ff 49 8b 44 24 68 48 85 c0 74 1e 48 89 c3 <48> 8b 03 48 8d 73 88 4c 89 e7 0f 18 08 41 ff d5 48 8b 03 48 85 > > > > > > RIP [<ffffffff80307525>] call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50 > > > > > > RSP <ffff810170811e58> > > > > > > ---[ end trace ca143223eefdc828 ]--- > > > > > > Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed! > > > > > cfq-iosched.c hasn't been altered (yet) so it might not be a regression. > > > > > > > > It's not a regression, it's definitely in 2.6.25 as well. So that's a > > > > bit scary, I've been looking over this stuff this morning but haven't > > > > pin pointed anything yet. > > > > > > > > Alexey, is this something that reproduces for you? > > > > > > Not yet, second run of same workload went fine and I've never seen such > > > oopses before. > > > > And it oopses the very same way on the third run. as(1) again. > > So if there are any debugging patches, let me know. > > There seems to be a small race in the destructor path, can you see if > this makes a difference? > > diff --git a/block/blk-ioc.c b/block/blk-ioc.c > index e34df7c..012f065 100644 > --- a/block/blk-ioc.c > +++ b/block/blk-ioc.c > @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ int put_io_context(struct io_context *ioc) > rcu_read_lock(); > if (ioc->aic && ioc->aic->dtor) > ioc->aic->dtor(ioc->aic); > - rcu_read_unlock(); > cfq_dtor(ioc); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > kmem_cache_free(iocontext_cachep, ioc); > return 1;
This helps in sense that 3 times bulk cross-compiles finish to the end. You'll hear me if another such oops will resurface. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Alexey Dobriyan
, (Sun Apr 27, 3:55 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Apr 28, 5:01 am)
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Mon Apr 28, 5:04 am)
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Alexey Dobriyan
, (Mon Apr 28, 12:55 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Alexey Dobriyan
, (Mon Apr 28, 11:21 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Apr 29, 2:06 am)
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Alexey Dobriyan
, (Wed Apr 30, 3:12 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Sun May 4, 12:08 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Sun May 4, 12:25 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Alexey Dobriyan
, (Sun May 4, 1:15 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-$sha1: RIP call_for_each_cic+0x25/0x50
, Alexey Dobriyan
, (Sun May 4, 2:17 pm)
2.6.25-$sha1: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Alexey Dobriyan
, (Sat May 10, 3:37 am)
2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Alexey Dobriyan
, (Mon May 26, 10:27 pm)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue May 27, 6:35 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Tue May 27, 8:18 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Wed May 28, 3:07 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Wed May 28, 3:30 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Fabio Checconi
, (Wed May 28, 4:52 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Wed May 28, 4:58 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Wed May 28, 5:44 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Wed May 28, 6:20 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Wed May 28, 9:38 pm)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Wed May 28, 11:26 pm)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Wed May 28, 11:42 pm)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Thu May 29, 2:17 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu May 29, 3:13 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Thu May 29, 4:25 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu May 29, 4:44 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Thu May 29, 5:11 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu May 29, 5:13 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Fri May 30, 4:04 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Fri May 30, 6:16 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Alexey Dobriyan
, (Fri May 30, 11:34 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Tue Jun 3, 8:31 pm)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Jun 4, 11:32 am)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Wed Jun 4, 9:23 pm)
Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Fri Jun 6, 7:49 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Tony Luck
Re: Hardware Error Kernel Mini-Summit
James Bottomley
Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] scsi: remove dma_is_consistent usage in 53c700
Andrey Borzenkov
Re: [possible regression] 2.6.22 reiserfs/libata sporadically hangs on resume from...
Jeffrey V. Merkey
Re: Versioning file system
David Miller
Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck
git
:
Oliver Kullmann
Re: how to move with history?
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH 2/3] git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing
Morten Welinder
Re: [PATCH] use xrealloc in help.c
Miles Bader
Re: way to automatically add untracked files?
Alex Riesen
Re: git exclude patterns for directory
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
Re: [2.6.30-rc3] powerpc: compilation error of mace module
webmaster Maintenance
&#32852;&#31995;&#31995;&#32479;&#31649;&#29702;&#21592;
Andreas Sundstrom
Re: ~60k interrupts/sec for 1Gb/s iperf with r8169
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Re: circular locking, mirred, 2.6.24.2
Bijay Singh
Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB: tm6000: add special usb request to quit i2c tuner transfer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
OMAP: DSS2: SDI driver
Linux Kernel Mailing List
PCI: introduce pci_pcie_cap()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
m68k: amiga - Mouse platform device conversion
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
openbsd-misc
:
frantisek holop
Re: mount ffs as msdos, system hangs
Ted Bullock
Re: Proliant DL380 G3 cannot get on network
Úlfar M. E. Johnson
installing openbsd in xen
Eric Furman
Re: Defending OpenBSD Performance
Damien Miller
Re: Patching a SSH 'Weakness'
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate