Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger list

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...>
Cc: <torvalds@...>, <akpm@...>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...>, <linux-embedded@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Tim Bird <tim.bird@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 2:22 pm

David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> writes:


I hope your job description doesn't include adding more and more
CONFIGs though.

I am sure there are lots of low hanging fruit where memory can be
saved and it's a good thing someone cares about that, but please don't
focus on the code size only. Or if you work on that don't do it 
using CONFIG or when you really add a new one find some other 
that is pointless and remove it first. 

There are simply already far too many of them and they make the 
kernel harder and harder to change.

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger list, David Woodhouse, (Wed Apr 30, 1:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger ..., Kristoffer Ericson, (Fri May 2, 7:58 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger ..., Andi Kleen, (Wed Apr 30, 2:22 pm)
[PATCH 1/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger list, David Woodhouse, (Wed Apr 30, 1:44 pm)