Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ross Biro
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 6:16 am

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Ross Biro <rossb@google.com> wrote:

The 2.6.23 results have been consistant with 2.6.24 results and
lmbench has crashed my test machine at least once.  I'm guessing some
sort of memory error causing a lot of ECC and slowing things down.

    Ross
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Ross Biro, (Tue Apr 29, 6:10 am)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Hugh Dickins, (Tue Apr 29, 6:57 am)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Ross Biro, (Tue Apr 29, 7:08 am)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Balbir Singh, (Tue Apr 29, 7:52 am)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Ross Biro, (Tue Apr 29, 8:21 am)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Hugh Dickins, (Tue Apr 29, 8:32 am)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Ross Biro, (Tue Apr 29, 9:05 am)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Balbir Singh, (Tue Apr 29, 9:42 am)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Ross Biro, (Tue Apr 29, 10:00 am)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Apr 29, 9:50 pm)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Hugh Dickins, (Wed Apr 30, 4:33 am)
Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23, Ross Biro, (Wed Apr 30, 6:16 am)