On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:38:54 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>= wrote:Today, that failed in its plan :-) Actually is it is a tree for the Linux Driver Project that Greg is running - I am in two minds about whether I should carry it. Currently, it is right at the end of the build and if something fails in there it gets reverted - I make no attempt to diagnose problems. Greg wanted "exposure". I will write up a general mail about what I want in linux-next from now on and I suspect that I will exclude most (if not all) of that tree. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
