David Miller wrote:Yes. The Linux process is becoming unreliable. Newly "stable" versions have stability problems. The development process looks childish. Seasoned developers say not to worry, that the process works. I do worry. BSD seems more attractive, and it may even be worth the considerable effort to switch my entire client-base. Linux was lucky to gain the foothold that it did: traditionally, BSD had a better system with a less restrictive licence, so it is surprising that manufacturers chose to go with Linux. BSD still has a less restrictive licence and when mainstream press becomes interested in Linux's quality problems it's adoption will fall. BSD is still a good, maybe even better, option. Linus, this is your baby and so it's your problem. Only you have the influence to change things. --
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [net-2.6.24][patch 2/2] Dynamically allocate the loopback device |
| Sam Ravnborg | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
