On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:11:11 +0200
"stephane eranian" <eranian@googlemail.com> wrote:

quoted text
> Sorry,
> 
> It's http://perfmon2.sf.net
> 
> 

hummmmm, I wonder why perfmon wants to reimplement half of the PCI layer...

+extern spinlock_t pci_config_lock;
+
+#define PCI_CONF1_ADDRESS(bus, devfn, reg) \
+       (0x80000000 | ((reg & 0xF00) << 16) | ((bus & 0xFF) << 16) \
+       | (devfn << 8) | (reg & 0xFC))
+
+#define is_ibs_pmc(x) (x == 4 || x == 5)
+
+static int pci_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
+                   unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value)
+{
+       unsigned long flags;

especially since this doesn't seem to use the proper config space abstractions :(
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/