Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Arnold
Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 4:39 pm

> i.e. this patent from December 2002

That's a patent application, not a patent.  That application has received 
a "final rejection" from the U.S. patent office (Microsoft is appealing, 
but so far their attempts at arguing the merits of the application have 
not been successful).  You can browse the relevant documents at

http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair

(The application number is 10/307,902).

Jeff Arnold
jbarnold@mit.edu
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Tomasz Chmielewski, (Thu Apr 24, 7:26 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Andi Kleen, (Thu Apr 24, 7:42 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Pavel Machek, (Sun Apr 27, 3:17 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Apr 27, 10:49 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Oliver Pinter, (Sun Apr 27, 12:51 pm)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Jesper Juhl, (Sun Apr 27, 12:58 pm)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Bill Davidsen, (Mon Apr 28, 12:07 pm)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Jeff Arnold, (Tue Apr 29, 4:39 pm)