On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:38:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:15:20 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:
> 
> > > > I believe Russell is referring to the removal of the ioctl, not the
> > > > compile breakage.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > That would be interesting information (although I have a vague feeling that
> > > it has been discussed before).
> > 
> > Yes:  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/27/291
> > (now that Harvey reminded me/us)
> 
> oh, OK, whatever, that's easy.  I dropped the old patch and queued this
> one:

I'll spend some time this coming weekend working out precisely what it
requires from the ioctl interface - maybe we can have a cut-down ioctl
interface that bolts straight on as an "add on" to the new controls
without being too invasive, while still allowing its PCMCIA bits to
work.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/