* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
quoted text > From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:01:02 +0200 (CEST)
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >
> > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
> Ironically, I just bisected sparc64 bootup failures to the following
> changeset. It's very late here, and I haven't looked into the
> details, but it seems to wedge in free_area_init_nodes() on a non-NUMA
> system with CONFIG_NUMA disabled.
hm. I guess the next thing you plan to check is whether Thomas's patch
fixes it?
quoted text > Isn't it funny that this optimization not only was useless, but also
> broke things. :-/
yeah and sorry :-/ It would still be nice to understand why this
happened, it looks like a weird (and unexpected) interaction.
Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] bitops: remove "optimizations" , Ingo Molnar , (Tue Apr 29, 10:20 am)