Re: patch usb-mos7840-test-and-propagate-set_uart_reg-return-value.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree

Previous thread: [PATCH] mcp23s08: check read_regs() retval by Roel Kluin on Thursday, April 17, 2008 - 12:08 am. (1 message)

Next thread: [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: fix negative check on unsigned by Roel Kluin on Thursday, April 17, 2008 - 12:31 am. (2 messages)
To: Greg KH <greg@...>, <linux-usb@...>, lkml <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008 - 12:16 am

The test for an mos7840_set_uart_reg() error return value only works when
status is signed. propagate its error value.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
---

diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c
index aeeb9cb..ef1ede2 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c
@@ -1713,7 +1713,7 @@ static int mos7840_tiocmset(struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *file,
{
struct moschip_port *mos7840_port;
unsigned int mcr;
- unsigned int status;
+ int status;

dbg("%s - port %d", __FUNCTION__, port->number);

@@ -1739,11 +1739,10 @@ static int mos7840_tiocmset(struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *file,

mos7840_port->shadowMCR = mcr;

- status = 0;
status = mos7840_set_uart_reg(port, MODEM_CONTROL_REGISTER, mcr);
if (status < 0) {
dbg("setting MODEM_CONTROL_REGISTER Failed\n");
- return -1;
+ return status;
}

return 0;
--

To: <12o3l@...>, <gregkh@...>, <greg@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <steve@...>
Date: Monday, April 28, 2008 - 7:53 pm

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

Subject: USB: mos7840: test and propagate set_uart_reg return value

to my gregkh-2.6 tree. Its filename is

usb-mos7840-test-and-propagate-set_uart_reg-return-value.patch

This tree can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/patches/

From 12o3l@tiscali.nl Wed Apr 16 21:16:30 2008
From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:16:24 +0200
Subject: USB: mos7840: test and propagate set_uart_reg return value
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Message-ID: <4806CF18.2050403@tiscali.nl>

The test for an mos7840_set_uart_reg() error return value only works when
status is signed. propagate its error value.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
Cc: SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c
@@ -1713,7 +1713,7 @@ static int mos7840_tiocmset(struct usb_s
{
struct moschip_port *mos7840_port;
unsigned int mcr;
- unsigned int status;
+ int status;

dbg("%s - port %d", __func__, port->number);

@@ -1740,11 +1740,10 @@ static int mos7840_tiocmset(struct usb_s

mos7840_port->shadowMCR = mcr;

- status = 0;
status = mos7840_set_uart_reg(port, MODEM_CONTROL_REGISTER, mcr);
if (status < 0) {
dbg("setting MODEM_CONTROL_REGISTER Failed\n");
- return -1;
+ return status;
}

return 0;

Patches currently in gregkh-2.6 which might be from 12o3l@tiscali.nl are

usb/usb-mos7840-test-and-propagate-set_uart_reg-return-value.patch
--

To: gregkh@suse.de <gregkh@...>
Cc: <12o3l@...>, <greg@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 2:31 am

NAK. Reviewer's question was never answered.

-sb
--

To: SL Baur <steve@...>
Cc: <12o3l@...>, <greg@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 2:51 am

Does that mean that the original patch is invalid? Or just that your
question was never answered?

thanks,

greg k-h
--

To: Greg KH <gregkh@...>
Cc: <12o3l@...>, <greg@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 3:33 am

I think there are more of the same issues that the patch
addressed in the same file and the patcher never responded
back about that.

-sb
--

To: SL Baur <steve@...>
Cc: <12o3l@...>, <greg@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 2:03 am

But again, is the current patch somehow not valid?

thanks,

greg k-h
--

To: Greg KH <gregkh@...>
Cc: <12o3l@...>, <greg@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 9:56 pm

No, it's fine.

-sb
--

To: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...>, <linux-usb@...>, lkml <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008 - 2:58 am

O.K. I can see you're changing types to properly match the function return
values. May I ask why you didn't change mos7840_tiocmget the same way?

-sb
--

Previous thread: [PATCH] mcp23s08: check read_regs() retval by Roel Kluin on Thursday, April 17, 2008 - 12:08 am. (1 message)

Next thread: [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: fix negative check on unsigned by Roel Kluin on Thursday, April 17, 2008 - 12:31 am. (2 messages)